Security awareness for government — BIO 2.0 and NIS2 in one programme

Government organizations remain a primary target: ransomware on municipalities, hacktivism against ministries, targeted phishing on civil servants. The government also faces a dual regime: BIO 2.0 (Baseline Information Security Government) as a broad standard and NIS2 for specific designated entities. 2LRN4 delivers a security awareness programme that addresses both, with sector-specific scenarios and audit-ready reporting.

For municipalities, provinces, water authorities, ministries, government agencies and joint arrangements.

BIO 2.0-ready Cbw / Cbw / NIS2 art. 21 + 24 GDPR-government Segmented by role
security awareness government

2LRN4 helps organizations turn this topic into an approach that supports employees, management and compliance at the same time.

Where organizations usually get stuck

Standalone training, isolated phishing tests and fragmented reporting make improvement difficult. This page shows how 2LRN4 brings that together in one workable approach.

Security awareness in government — at a glance
  • BIO 2.0 + NIS2 in one programme — demonstrable for both frameworks without duplicate admin
  • Audiences per government role — civil servant, manager, council, executive, IT, policy advisor
  • Realistic government scenarios — phishing with citizen-portal themes, supplier fraud, hacktivism, insider risk
  • GDPR-government specific — processing citizen data, breaches, DPO procedures, records management
  • Council/board training — NIS2 article 24 for elected officials and executive boards
  • Audit-ready for regulators — exportable for BIO audit, data protection authority and internal control

BIO 2.0 and NIS2 — different frameworks, one goal

All Dutch government organizations must comply with BIO 2.0 (Baseline Information Security Government, based on ISO/IEC 27002:2022). Additionally, specific government entities fall under NIS2: critical agencies, digital infrastructure providers in public service and certain ministries.

BIO and NIS2 overlap in awareness requirements but have different audit frameworks. 2LRN4 links participation and behaviour to both standards in one report — providing evidence for both BIO audit and NIS2 supervision in one export.

Audiences that each need their own content

A policy advisor at a ministry, a counter clerk at a municipality, an IT administrator and an elected council member each have different risk profiles. 2LRN4 segments by government role: front office gets scenarios about citizen contact and identity fraud, policy advisors get targeted phishing and spear phishing, IT gets advanced modules, councils and boards follow NIS2 article 24 training.

Modules are available in NL and EN; for municipalities with international policy roles also in 27+ other languages.

Phishing simulation with government themes

Generic phishing does not work for civil servants who have daily citizen contact. 2LRN4 delivers government-specific scenarios: fake citizen-portal notifications, supplier mails for procurement projects, urgent requests from elected officials out of hours, hacktivism announcements on internal forums.

Anyone who clicks gets a short explainer module. Reporting shows by department, location and role who is improving.

NIS2 article 24 training for elected officials and executive boards

Under NIS2, board members of designated government entities are personally liable. For elected councils, executive boards and agency directors a training obligation applies.

2LRN4 delivers a board track that specifically addresses government risks: ransomware impact on citizen services, hacktivism, geopolitical threats, supplier risk in large procurements, governance reporting to council or provincial bodies.

How this solution fits into a broader awareness program

Most organizations do not solve this topic with one isolated action. They need a combination of clear content, targeted follow-up, segmentation and reporting that can also be explained internally.

That is why 2LRN4 connects this solution to the wider platform, the knowledge base and management reporting. It keeps this from being an isolated page and turns it into part of a structural approach.

Implementation, adoption and management reporting

A strong solution only becomes valuable when teams can actually operate it. That is why 2LRN4 focuses not only on content or simulation, but also on setup, segmentation, reporting and adoption. That makes awareness easier to scale without turning administration into a job of its own.

For management, explainability matters most. Which teams improve? Which themes need more attention? How does this support audit or NIS2 goals? That is why this page is written for both the user and the decision-maker.

Why organizations choose this approach
Fast first step
Demo with relevant use cases
Less fragmentation
Training, phishing and reporting together
Easier to explain
Insight by audience and theme

This approach helps organizations move faster from isolated activities to a program that supports employees and gives management useful steering insight.

Why this solution stays scalable

Many awareness initiatives start well and then lose momentum because management becomes fragmented. Audiences change, content must be updated and reporting requires more manual work than expected. A scalable approach therefore requires not only strong content, but also a platform that evolves with growth and changing risk.

2LRN4 supports that scalability by bringing training, phishing simulation, reporting and internal content together. That means this page does not stop at a promise; it points to a solution that is also operationally sustainable.

FAQ

Is 2LRN4 BIO 2.0 compliant?

Yes. BIO 2.0 (based on ISO/IEC 27002:2022) requires structured awareness and periodic training. 2LRN4 directly addresses BIO 2.0 awareness controls, with audit evidence for inspection and internal control.

Which government entities fall under NIS2?

Under NIS2, essential public administration entities at central and regional level are designated, plus specific agencies and critical digital infrastructure. Municipalities are not automatically designated, but specific critical municipal services may fall under NIS2.

How do we handle elected councils and executive boards?

Elected officials and members of the executive board follow a separate board track of about 60 minutes per year (NIS2 article 24). Separate reporting for governance evidence to the council or provincial body.

Does the platform work with national identity SSO?

The platform integrates via Microsoft Entra/AD and SAML 2.0 on the staff side. For specific agencies separate SSO connections are possible in consultation.

How do you support a municipality with multiple business units?

The platform supports multi-tenant segmentation within one licence. Per unit (e.g. social affairs, urban planning, council support) separate reporting and audience content. Temporary and external workers can be marked separately.

What if we are subject to DPIA requirements?

The platform is GDPR-compliant by design and provides standard data processing agreement, EU hosting (no export outside the EU) and DPIA-supporting documentation. Suitable for strict DPIA requirements for government organizations.

Book a demo

Want to see how 2LRN4 turns this topic into training, phishing, reporting and a workable program? Book a demo and we will show the most relevant use cases right away.

Trust

In a demo, we show how this solution fits your audiences, risks and reporting needs.